VECCON digital surveillance system for the control of Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever
10/10/2020 Views : 362
SANG GEDE PURNAMA
Dengue
Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) cases are still a public health problem in Indonesia.
DHF cases are recorded to tend to increase. Since the beginning of the
occurrence of dengue fever in Surabaya in 1968, the reported cases of DHF were
only 0.05 per 100,000 population then continued to increase to reach 86 per
100,000 population (Kemenkes, 2020).
Dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) is
caused by the dengue virus. This dengue virus has 4 serotypes, namely Den-1,
Den-2, Den-3 and Den-4. Serotypes that are often found are Den-2 and Den-3. The
Aedes sp mosquito is the vector of this virus, this mosquito, Aedes aegypti, is
usually indoors and Aedes albopictus, which breed outside (Mulyatno et al.,
2018).
Mosquitoes can lay 100-200 eggs and
within one week can grow into adult mosquitoes. This condition causes the
vector density level to be high if the mosquito breeding grounds are not
controlled (WHO, 2016). Aedes sp.
Mosquitoes usually bite during the day at 10 o'clock and usually repeatedly.
For this reason, water reservoirs inside and outside the house must be drained
frequently so that they do not become breeding places for mosquitoes (WHO, 2012).
Efforts to control dengue fever have
been carried out by using the fogging method with chemicals for adult
mosquitoes and also larvicides. The use of chemical methods can cause
resistance to mosquitoes and damage the environment (Morales et al.,
2019), (Marcombe et al.,
2018), (Francis et al.,
2017). So far, control measures using
physical approaches such as draining, closing water reservoirs and selling used
goods are recommended, however, their implementation is still not optimal.
The surveillance system that has
been developed using manual methods is still finding biased and replicated
data. Manual systems take time to implement and are not reported in an
integrated manner. Not all of the data collected were reported nor analyzed
properly. Based on these problems, an integrated and real-time surveillance
system is needed to collect data on the incidence of DHF.
The
development of the Veccon application using a web-based and mobile-based
digital approach is made by integrating the system from the initial entry data,
namely hospitals, reports from the health department and puskesmas. Data from
the hospital will be sent to the District Health Office and then reported to
the Puskesmas. The Puskesmas will send a surveillance team to the field. The
surveillance team uses a digital reporting system to record the patient's house
and 20 surrounding houses. The data will be directly integrated into the
Puskesmas and the Health Office. The data includes case coordinate data, larva
density maps and case maps. The data will
continue to be collected for a certain period of time. Based on the data
entered, it can be analyzed the level of case density in the area, the density
of larvae and population density. This data can be used by the puskesmas to
make further policies on DHF control by creating programs that focus more on
vulnerable areas in the work area of the local puskesmas.
Reporting using web and mobile-based
digital technology is currently needed to support smart cities, where people
can play an active role in using technology in accessing government data and
information. The existing information technology can assist in implementing the
program more quickly and precisely, especially in controlling the incidence of
DHF.
The strategy for developing digital
surveillance systems has also been used in several countries. Integrated dengue
control efforts are recommended by WHO (WHO, 2012). Brazil developed
a web-based digital system to speed up the reporting process and the work of
laboratory technicians, reduce time and reduce errors. This helps accelerate
the decision-making process (Brasil et al.,
2015). Sri Lanka has also developed a DHF
surveillance system called Epihack, surveillance using a mobile phone which is
then analyzed into data and maps of vulnerable areas for intervention (Lwin et al.,
2019).
Mapping
of dengue-prone areas based on cases and larva density
The development of digital
surveillance for dengue hemorrhagic fever is needed. The development of web and
mobile based Veccon (vector control) technology is a necessity for programs and
public health. This technology makes it easier for the public and health
workers to report the incidence of dengue fever and the density of larvae and this
data can be quickly received by officers. This can speed up work and reduce the
risk of data bias.
Based on the results of data collection using the Veccon
application, a mapping of dengue-prone areas and the level of mosquito density
in an area was obtained. Following are the results of the analysis and
geographic mapping of DHF incidence in South Denpasar. The following is a map
of dengue-prone areas based on larva density. This map shows that the Sesetan
area has a high risk as an area that has a high larva density above 1,250 larva
positive containers. Then followed by the Sidakarya area which has a positive
larva density of 850-1250 containers. Areas that have a high rate of cases and
a high density of larvae are prone areas that need serious attention for DHF
control efforts.
Figure 1. Mapping of dengue-prone areas based on larva
density
Mapping of dengue-prone areas based
on cases and population density
The following is a
mapping of dengue-prone areas based on dengue cases and population density.
This map shows that the Sidakarya area has a high population density of over
6,500 people / km2. This is followed by the Sesetan Village Area which has a
density of 4,500-6500 people / km2. Furthermore, Panjer Village is <4500
people / km2. The high level of population density is one of the risk factors
for the spread of DHF cases. The denser the area, the more susceptible to
mosquito bite transmission.
Figure 2. Mapping of DHF cases with population density
Based
on the analysis of the prone areas, policy makers can make priority programs in
areas prone to dengue. Quick and precise decisions are needed to carry out DHF
control in the area. Carry out simultaneous eradication of mosquito nests in
vulnerable areas as well as education to the surrounding community.
References
Brasil, L. M. et al. (2015) ‘Web platform
using digital image processing and geographic information system tools: A
Brazilian case study on dengue’, BioMedical Engineering Online, 14(1),
pp. 1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12938-015-0052-2.
Francis, S. et al. (2017) ‘Insecticide resistance to permethrin and
malathion and associated mechanisms in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes from St. Andrew
Jamaica’, PLoS ONE, 12(6), pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179673.
Kemenkes (2020) Laporan Kejadian DBD. Jakarta.
Lwin, M. O. et al. (2019) ‘Epihack Sri Lanka: Development of a
mobile surveillance tool for dengue fever’, BMC Medical Informatics and
Decision Making, 19(1), pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0829-5.
Marcombe, S. et al. (2018) ‘Alternative insecticides for larval
control of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in Lao PDR: Insecticide resistance
and semi-field trial study’, Parasites and Vectors. Parasites &
Vectors, 11(1), pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3187-8.
Morales, D. et al. (2019) ‘Resistance Status of Aedes aegypti to
Deltamethrin, Malathion, and Temephos in Ecuador’, Journal of the American
Mosquito Control Association, 35(2), pp. 113–122. doi: 10.2987/19-6831.1.
Mulyatno, K. C. et al. (2018) ‘Detection and serotyping of dengue
viruses in aedes aegypti and aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) collected in
Surabaya, Indonesia from 2008 to 2015’, Japanese Journal of Infectious
Diseases, 71(1), pp. 58–61. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2017.117.
WHO (2012) ‘Treatment, prevention and control global strategy for dengue
prevention and control 2’, WHO geneva.
WHO (2016) ‘Vector Surveillance and Control at Ports, Airports, and Ground
Crossings’, International Health Regulations, p. 92. Available at:
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204660/1/9789241549592_eng.pdf.